The difference between independent contractors and employees is significant, but it\u2019s not always clear. In recent years, there has been a surge in litigation over alleged worker misclassification. The growing debate over work classification will have a major impact on companies around the country, including those in Florida.<\/p>\n
The Rise of the Independent Contractor\u00a0 <\/strong><\/p>\n Independent contract work is not new, nor is the issue of misclassification. However, in recent years, the issue has become especially relevant as the number of independent contractors has risen. According to the Freelancing in America: 2019 Survey<\/a> from Upwork, 57 million Americans freelanced in 2019. That\u2019s 35 percent of the U.S. workforce.<\/p>\n Many independent contractors enjoy the flexibility that freelance work provides. However, there are downsides for workers. The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) establishes minimum wage, overtime and recordkeeping protections for employees, but these rules do not cover independent contractors. Furthermore, independent contractors may miss out on other benefits that are guaranteed to employees, such as workers\u2019 compensation, unemployment benefits and employer-paid Social Security and Medicare taxes.<\/p>\n As a result of these differences, when a worker is misclassified as an independent contractor, serious losses for the worker may occur. Companies accused of misclassification may be hit with lawsuits demanding back pay for lost wages.<\/p>\n Tests for Independent Contractors<\/strong><\/p>\n The Department of Labor<\/a> makes it clear that employers cannot misclassify workers even if the worker is fine with the arrangement. A worker is not an independent contractor simply because he or she has signed a contract saying so and receives a 1099 tax form. Whether a worker is an independent contractor depends on the nature of the relationship.<\/p>\n In addition, employers cannot assume that independent contractors can be excluded from workers\u2019 compensation insurance. In fact, as a best practice, anyone performing work for your company should be added to your workers\u2019 compensation insurance policy, unless your work contract specifies that they are responsible for their own workers\u2019 compensation insurance. This protects your business as much as it protects the worker. Some carriers will specify that unless you have a Certificate of Insurance for a subcontractor, you must include them in your workers\u2019 compensation insurance. This issue may arise during your work comp payroll audit.<\/p>\n Unfortunately, there is not one single test that everyone agrees on. When deciding whether a worker is misclassified, the Supreme Court<\/a> has looked at six factors, which include the permanency of the relationship and the degree of control exercised.<\/p>\n The IRS urges consideration of three factors: behavioral control, financial control and the nature of the relationship. According to the IRS<\/a>, \u201cThe general rule is that an individual is an independent contractor if the payer has the right to control or direct only the result of the work, not what will be done and how it will be done.\u201d<\/p>\n However, other authorities have used different tests, some of which may be much stricter. In the Dynamex decision, for example, the California Supreme Court used a three-part test known as the ABC test. This decision led to AB5, a new California law that makes it more difficult for companies to classify workers as independent contractors.<\/p>\n Recent Lawsuits<\/strong><\/p>\n Many recent lawsuits have challenged worker classification issues. Some of these lawsuits are especially relevant to Florida businesses.<\/p>\n On a national level, lawsuits against Uber, Amazon, FedEx and other companies have been testing classification issues. According to Reuters<\/a>, Uber agreed to pay $20 million to settle a lawsuit involving drivers in California and Massachusetts and is now facing new litigation. After the passing of California\u2019s new worker classification law, Uber<\/a> has announced changes to its platform.<\/p>\n